Screener
RPHS vs MATE
Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
Both RPHS and MATE are alternative ETFs. RPHS charges 0.75% a year and MATE 0.97%. The main difference: RPHS follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- RPHS follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- RPHS covers North America; MATE covers emerging markets.
- RPHS costs 0.22% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| RPHS | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $56M | $39M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.76% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.71% | — |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -13.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.