Screener
RPHS vs MSTQ
Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF vs LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF
Key differences
Both RPHS and MSTQ are alternative ETFs. RPHS charges 0.75% a year and MSTQ 1.55%. The main difference: RPHS follows a active selection strategy; MSTQ uses option income.
- RPHS follows a active selection strategy; MSTQ uses option income.
- RPHS costs 0.80% less per year.
- Over the last three years, MSTQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RPHS | MSTQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 1.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $56M | $39M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.76% | 0.65% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.5% | +27.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.4% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.73% | 15.40% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -31.05% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.