Screener
RPV vs XMVM
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
Key differences
- RPV is significantly larger than XMVM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XMVM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RPV | XMVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $455M |
| Since | 2006 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.33% | 1.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | +30.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.77% | 15.56% |
| Max drawdown | -50.67% | -45.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RPV and XMVM
Explore further