Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RSBA vs MSMR

Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF vs McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF

RSBA

Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF

Return stacked ETFs

Annual cost

1.01%

Fund size

$53M

MSMR

McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF

MSCM Funds

Annual cost

1.06%

Fund size

$166M

Key differences

  • RSBA costs 0.05% less per year.
  • MSMR is significantly larger than RSBA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • RSBA is classified as alternative, while MSMR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • RSBA follows a arbitrage strategy; MSMR uses active selection.

Side-by-side comparison

RSBAMSMR
Annual cost (TER)1.01%1.06%
Fund size (AUM)$53M$166M
Since20242021
Dividend yield2.84%1.88%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyarbitrageactive selection
CAGR 1Y+5.2%+25.9%
CAGR 3YN/A+20.5%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A1.40
Volatility 1Y4.62%12.03%
Max drawdown-2.83%-14.86%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to RSBA and MSMR