Screener
RSIT vs CTA
Return Stacked International Stocks & Managed Futures ETF vs Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- CTA costs 0.23% less per year.
- RSIT follows a multi strategy strategy; CTA uses systematic alpha.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSIT | CTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $1.7B |
| Since | 2026 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.03% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.72% |
| Max drawdown | -2.48% | -18.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSIT and CTA
Explore further