Screener
RSMV vs BLCV
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF
Key differences
- BLCV costs 0.49% less per year.
- BLCV is significantly larger than RSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSMV | BLCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $317M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 1.29% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.84% | 11.64% |
| Max drawdown | -17.58% | -13.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSMV and BLCV
Explore further