Screener
RSMV vs DCOR
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF
Key differences
- DCOR costs 0.81% less per year.
- DCOR is significantly larger than RSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSMV is classified as equity, while DCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RSMV follows a active selection strategy; DCOR uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSMV | DCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 0.95% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.84% | 11.99% |
| Max drawdown | -17.58% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSMV and DCOR
Explore further