Screener
RSMV vs DFUV
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
Key differences
- DFUV costs 0.74% less per year.
- DFUV is significantly larger than RSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DFUV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSMV | DFUV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.21% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $14.4B |
| Since | 2025 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.84% | 11.87% |
| Max drawdown | -17.58% | -17.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSMV and DFUV
Explore further