Screener
RSMV vs FDG
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- FDG costs 0.50% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than RSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSMV | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $387M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +35.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.84% | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -17.58% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSMV and FDG
Explore further