Screener
RSMV vs MFVL
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs Motley Fool Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- MFVL costs 0.45% less per year.
- RSMV is significantly larger than MFVL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSMV follows a active selection strategy; MFVL uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSMV | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $7M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.84% | — |
| Max drawdown | -17.58% | -7.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSMV and MFVL
Explore further