Screener
RSMV vs VBK
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VBK costs 0.90% less per year.
- VBK is significantly larger than RSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSMV follows a active selection strategy; VBK uses index tracking.
- VBK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSMV | VBK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $42.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 0.47% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.1% | +35.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.92% | 19.28% |
| Max drawdown | -17.58% | -38.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSMV and VBK
Explore further