Screener
RSP vs RSPF
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF
Key differences
- RSP costs 0.20% less per year.
- RSP is significantly larger than RSPF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSP follows a index enhanced strategy; RSPF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSP | RSPF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $86.4B | $274M |
| Since | 2003 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.6% | +6.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.2% | +17.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.73% | 15.08% |
| Max drawdown | -39.04% | -44.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSP and RSPF
Explore further