Skip to content
Screener

RSPA vs PEPS

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF vs Parametric Equity Plus ETF

RSPA

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF

Annual cost

0.29%

Fund size

$859M

PEPS

Parametric Equity Plus ETF

Annual cost

0.10%

Fund size

$28M

Key differences

Both RSPA and PEPS are alternative ETFs. RSPA charges 0.29% a year and PEPS 0.10%. The main difference: RSPA follows a index enhanced strategy; PEPS uses option income.

  • RSPA follows a index enhanced strategy; PEPS uses option income.
  • PEPS costs 0.19% less per year.
  • RSPA is much larger than PEPS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

RSPAPEPS
Annual cost (TER)0.29%0.10%
Fund size (AUM)$859M$28M
Since20242024
Dividend yield9.01%0.88%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex enhancedoption income
CAGR 1Y+18.5%+27.2%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y9.50%13.61%
Max drawdown-15.37%-9.79%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to RSPA and PEPS