Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RSPF vs RSP

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

RSPF

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF

Invesco

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$274M

RSP

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

Invesco

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$86.4B

Key differences

  • RSP costs 0.20% less per year.
  • RSP is significantly larger than RSPF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • RSPF follows a index tracking strategy; RSP uses index enhanced.
  • Over the last 3 years, RSPF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

RSPFRSP
Annual cost (TER)0.40%0.20%
Fund size (AUM)$274M$86.4B
Since20062003
Dividend yield1.66%1.53%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+6.4%+19.6%
CAGR 3Y+17.6%+15.2%
CAGR 5Y+5.9%+8.4%
Sharpe 3Y0.840.83
Volatility 1Y15.08%11.73%
Max drawdown-44.80%-39.04%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to RSPF and RSP