Screener
RSPM vs RPV
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- RPV costs 0.05% less per year.
- RPV is significantly larger than RSPM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPM | RPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $179M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 2.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.1% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.1% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.42 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.24% | 12.76% |
| Max drawdown | -39.84% | -50.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPM and RPV
Explore further