Screener
RSPN vs XLII
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF vs State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
Key differences
- XLII costs 0.05% less per year.
- RSPN is significantly larger than XLII — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSPN is classified as equity, while XLII is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RSPN follows a index tracking strategy; XLII uses option income.
- RSPN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPN | XLII | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $981M | $3M |
| Since | 2006 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.81% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.47% | — |
| Max drawdown | -42.02% | -10.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPN and XLII
Explore further