Screener
RSPU vs UPW
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF vs ProShares Ultra Utilities
Key differences
- RSPU costs 0.55% less per year.
- RSPU is significantly larger than UPW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSPU follows a index tracking strategy; UPW uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, UPW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPU | UPW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $575M | $25M |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | 1.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.4% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.3% | +11.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.70% | 28.45% |
| Max drawdown | -36.85% | -62.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPU and UPW
Explore further