Screener
RSSL vs COPX
Global X Russell 2000 ETF vs Global X Copper Miners ETF
Key differences
- RSSL costs 0.57% less per year.
- COPX is significantly larger than RSSL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- COPX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSSL | COPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $7.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.33% | 2.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.0% | +114.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +35.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +18.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.27% | 41.00% |
| Max drawdown | -27.79% | -65.41% |
Similar to RSSL and COPX
Explore further