Screener
RSSL vs PAVE
Global X Russell 2000 ETF vs Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Key differences
- RSSL costs 0.39% less per year.
- PAVE is significantly larger than RSSL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PAVE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSSL | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.33% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.19% | 18.75% |
| Max drawdown | -27.79% | -44.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSSL and PAVE
Explore further