Screener
RSSL vs QRMI
Global X Russell 2000 ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Key differences
- RSSL costs 0.52% less per year.
- RSSL is significantly larger than QRMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RSSL is classified as equity, while QRMI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RSSL follows a index tracking strategy; QRMI uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSSL | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $16M |
| Since | 2024 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.33% | 12.36% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.50 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.19% | 5.77% |
| Max drawdown | -27.79% | -20.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSSL and QRMI
Explore further