Screener
RTH vs BLCV
VanEck Retail ETF vs iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF
Key differences
Both RTH and BLCV are equity ETFs. RTH charges 0.35% a year and BLCV 0.46%. The main difference: RTH follows a index tracking strategy; BLCV uses active selection.
- RTH follows a index tracking strategy; BLCV uses active selection.
- RTH costs 0.11% less per year.
- Over the last three years, BLCV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RTH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RTH | BLCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $253M | $325M |
| Since | 2011 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 1.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.0% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.08% | 11.89% |
| Max drawdown | -25.00% | -13.44% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.