Screener
RTH vs FFF
VanEck Retail ETF vs Founders 100 ETF
Key differences
Both RTH and FFF are equity ETFs. RTH charges 0.35% a year and FFF 0.75%. The main difference: RTH follows a index tracking strategy; FFF uses active selection.
- RTH follows a index tracking strategy; FFF uses active selection.
- RTH costs 0.40% less per year.
- RTH is much larger than FFF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- RTH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RTH | FFF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $253M | $5M |
| Since | 2011 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.08% | — |
| Max drawdown | -25.00% | -21.89% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.