Screener
RTH vs FNDX
VanEck Retail ETF vs Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
Key differences
Both RTH and FNDX are equity ETFs. RTH charges 0.35% a year and FNDX 0.25%. The main difference: RTH follows a index tracking strategy; FNDX uses index enhanced.
- RTH follows a index tracking strategy; FNDX uses index enhanced.
- FNDX costs 0.10% less per year.
- FNDX is much larger than RTH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, FNDX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RTH | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $253M | $25.5B |
| Since | 2011 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.0% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +20.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.08% | 10.45% |
| Max drawdown | -25.00% | -37.72% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.