Screener
RTH vs VICE
VanEck Retail ETF vs AdvisorShares Vice ETF
Key differences
- RTH costs 0.64% less per year.
- RTH is significantly larger than VICE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RTH follows a index tracking strategy; VICE uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RTH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RTH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RTH | VICE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $7M |
| Since | 2011 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 0.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.4% | +2.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.88% | 13.14% |
| Max drawdown | -25.00% | -38.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RTH and VICE
Explore further