Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

RULE vs ACES

Adaptive Core ETF vs ALPS Clean Energy ETF

RULE

Adaptive Core ETF

Annual cost

1.84%

Fund size

$16M

ACES

ALPS Clean Energy ETF

Annual cost

0.55%

Fund size

$145M

Key differences

RULE is a mixed asset ETF, while ACES is an equity ETF. RULE charges 1.84% a year and ACES 0.55%.

  • RULE is a mixed asset fund, while ACES is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • RULE follows a active selection strategy; ACES uses index tracking.
  • ACES costs 1.29% less per year.
  • ACES is much larger than RULE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

RULEACES
Annual cost (TER)1.84%0.55%
Fund size (AUM)$16M$145M
Since20212018
Dividend yield0.00%0.54%
Asset classmixed assetequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+41.0%+55.9%
CAGR 3Y+17.4%-3.3%
CAGR 5YN/A-10.4%
Sharpe 3Y0.81-0.03
Volatility 1Y21.40%33.45%
Max drawdown-30.48%-79.05%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to RULE and ACES