Screener
RULE vs AMAX
Adaptive Core ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- AMAX costs 0.48% less per year.
- AMAX is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RULE is classified as mixed asset, while AMAX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RULE follows a active selection strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RULE | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.84% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $60M |
| Since | 2021 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 10.63% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.5% | +11.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.69% | 9.98% |
| Max drawdown | -30.48% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RULE and AMAX
Explore further