Screener
RULE vs DFAC
Adaptive Core ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
Key differences
- DFAC costs 1.67% less per year.
- DFAC is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RULE is classified as mixed asset, while DFAC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, DFAC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RULE | DFAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.84% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $44.5B |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.95% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.5% | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.69% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -30.48% | -23.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RULE and DFAC
Explore further