Screener
RULE vs THIR
Adaptive Core ETF vs THOR Index Rotation ETF
Key differences
- THIR costs 1.15% less per year.
- THIR is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RULE is classified as mixed asset, while THIR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RULE follows a active selection strategy; THIR uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| RULE | THIR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.84% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $210M |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.35% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.5% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.69% | 11.55% |
| Max drawdown | -30.48% | -10.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RULE and THIR
Explore further