Skip to content
Screener

RWK vs FMCE

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF vs FM Compounders Equity ETF

RWK

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$1.2B

FMCE

FM Compounders Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.72%

Fund size

$68M

Key differences

Both RWK and FMCE are equity ETFs. RWK charges 0.39% a year and FMCE 0.72%. The main difference: RWK follows a index enhanced strategy; FMCE uses active selection.

  • RWK follows a index enhanced strategy; FMCE uses active selection.
  • RWK costs 0.33% less per year.
  • RWK is much larger than FMCE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • RWK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RWKFMCE
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.72%
Fund size (AUM)$1.2B$68M
Since20082024
Dividend yield1.14%0.77%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex enhancedactive selection
CAGR 1Y+29.4%+10.6%
CAGR 3Y+17.7%N/A
CAGR 5Y+11.1%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.78N/A
Volatility 1Y16.90%12.61%
Max drawdown-46.20%-11.69%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to RWK and FMCE