Screener
RWK vs IJK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF vs iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IJK costs 0.22% less per year.
- IJK is significantly larger than RWK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IJK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWK | IJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $10.6B |
| Since | 2008 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 0.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +17.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.7% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.84% | 17.09% |
| Max drawdown | -46.20% | -39.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWK and IJK
Explore further