Screener
RWK vs XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Key differences
- XMHQ costs 0.14% less per year.
- XMHQ is significantly larger than RWK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RWK has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RWK | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $5.2B |
| Since | 2008 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +12.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.7% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.84% | 15.56% |
| Max drawdown | -46.20% | -36.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RWK and XMHQ
Explore further