Screener
RXI vs MSFU
iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF vs Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares
Key differences
- RXI costs 0.59% less per year.
- MSFU is significantly larger than RXI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RXI follows a index tracking strategy; MSFU uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, RXI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RXI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RXI | MSFU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $268M | $816M |
| Since | 2006 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.61% | 11.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | -26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.1% | +1.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.41% | 47.41% |
| Max drawdown | -35.78% | -59.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RXI and MSFU
Explore further