Screener
RXI vs UCC
iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF vs ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary
Key differences
- RXI costs 0.56% less per year.
- RXI is significantly larger than UCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RXI follows a index tracking strategy; UCC uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, UCC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RXI | UCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $268M | $14M |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.61% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.1% | +23.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.41% | 36.21% |
| Max drawdown | -35.78% | -61.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RXI and UCC
Explore further