Screener
RYLD vs IWL
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.45% less per year.
- RYLD is classified as alternative, while IWL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RYLD follows a option income strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RYLD | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2019 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 11.85% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.1% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.4% | +24.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.8% | +14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.82% | 12.34% |
| Max drawdown | -41.52% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RYLD and IWL
Explore further