Screener
RYLG vs RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- RYLG costs 0.25% less per year.
- RYLD is significantly larger than RYLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RYLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RYLG | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 7.42% | 11.85% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.0% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.94% | 10.82% |
| Max drawdown | -22.37% | -41.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RYLG and RYLD
Explore further