Screener
RZG vs RPG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RPG is significantly larger than RZG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RZG | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $121M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +36.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.3% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.58% | 19.62% |
| Max drawdown | -54.02% | -36.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RZG and RPG
Explore further