Screener
RZG vs SLYV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- SLYV costs 0.20% less per year.
- SLYV is significantly larger than RZG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RZG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SLYV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RZG | SLYV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $121M | $4.6B |
| Since | 2006 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 1.84% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.2% | +38.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +14.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.3% | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.58% | 18.43% |
| Max drawdown | -54.02% | -47.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RZG and SLYV
Explore further