Screener
RZV vs SPHQ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Key differences
- SPHQ costs 0.20% less per year.
- SPHQ is significantly larger than RZV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPHQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RZV | SPHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $17.3B |
| Since | 2006 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.36% | 1.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.5% | +24.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +15.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.84% | 12.73% |
| Max drawdown | -60.42% | -31.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RZV and SPHQ
Explore further