Screener
RZV vs SPLV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- SPLV costs 0.10% less per year.
- SPLV is significantly larger than RZV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RZV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RZV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RZV | SPLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $7.2B |
| Since | 2006 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.36% | 2.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.5% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.84% | 9.71% |
| Max drawdown | -60.42% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RZV and SPLV
Explore further