Screener
SAGP vs FNDC
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF vs Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
Key differences
- FNDC costs 0.26% less per year.
- FNDC is significantly larger than SAGP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAGP follows a active selection strategy; FNDC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FNDC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FNDC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAGP | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 3.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.3% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 14.29% |
| Max drawdown | -22.90% | -43.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAGP and FNDC
Explore further