Screener
SAGP vs SCHV
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- SCHV costs 0.61% less per year.
- SCHV is significantly larger than SAGP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAGP covers global markets; SCHV covers north america.
- SAGP follows a active selection strategy; SCHV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAGP | SCHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $15.2B |
| Since | 2022 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.3% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 10.71% |
| Max drawdown | -22.90% | -37.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAGP and SCHV
Explore further