Screener
SAMT vs CWS
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
Key differences
- SAMT is significantly larger than CWS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAMT is classified as alternative, while CWS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; CWS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $155M |
| Since | 2022 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 0.31% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.3% | -0.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.4% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.45 | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | 13.34% |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -33.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and CWS
Explore further