Screener
SAMT vs GSGO
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- GSGO costs 0.21% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than GSGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAMT is classified as alternative, while GSGO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; GSGO uses active selection.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | GSGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $163M |
| Since | 2022 | 1999 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -13.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and GSGO
Explore further