Screener
SAMT vs IG
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Key differences
- IG costs 0.47% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than IG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAMT is classified as alternative, while IG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; IG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | IG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $179M |
| Since | 2022 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 5.06% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.0% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | 4.81% |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -23.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and IG
Explore further