Screener
SAMT vs SCHA
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCHA costs 0.62% less per year.
- SCHA is significantly larger than SAMT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAMT is classified as alternative, while SCHA is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; SCHA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $22.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 1.05% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.0% | +43.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | +20.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | 18.16% |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -42.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and SCHA
Explore further