Screener
SAMT vs SCHF
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs Schwab International Equity ETF
Key differences
- SCHF costs 0.63% less per year.
- SCHF is significantly larger than SAMT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAMT is classified as alternative, while SCHF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; SCHF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $63.0B |
| Since | 2022 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 3.11% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.0% | +33.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | +19.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | 15.83% |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -34.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and SCHF
Explore further