Screener
SAMT vs SHUS
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF
Key differences
- SAMT costs 0.13% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than SHUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; SHUS uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | SHUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $24M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 1.29% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.3% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.4% | +10.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.45 | 0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | 10.18% |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -14.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and SHUS
Explore further