Screener
SAMT vs WZRD
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF vs Opportunistic Trader ETF
Key differences
- SAMT costs 0.34% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than WZRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; WZRD uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAMT | WZRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $619M | $4M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.45 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.65% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.57% | -71.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAMT and WZRD
Explore further