Screener
SAWG vs HQGO
AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF vs Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- HQGO costs 0.15% less per year.
- HQGO is significantly larger than SAWG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SAWG follows a active selection strategy; HQGO uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SAWG | HQGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $48M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 0.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.6% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.51% | 13.47% |
| Max drawdown | -18.68% | -20.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SAWG and HQGO
Explore further