Screener
SBAR vs MAGO
Simplify Barrier Income ETF vs Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF
Key differences
Both SBAR and MAGO are alternative ETFs. SBAR charges 0.75% a year and MAGO 0.99%. The main difference: SBAR costs 0.24% less per year.
- SBAR costs 0.24% less per year.
- SBAR is much larger than MAGO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| SBAR | MAGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $343M | $2M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 12.70% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.94% | — |
| Max drawdown | -5.32% | -17.98% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.